T: 02920 646 840

E: info@workingwordpr.com

working word
public relations marketing online pr events public affairs tradin
  • home
  • about us
    • about us
      • what clients say about us
      • news
      • our services
        • public relations
          • strategic PR advice
          • media relations
          • media training
          • crisis communications
          • staff or community communications
          • copywriting and editing
          • sponsorship
        • marketing
          • marketing strategies
          • advertising
          • online marketing
          • sms/mms marketing
          • promotional items
          • newsletters
          • corporate literature
          • video content
        • online PR
          • websites
          • digital PR
          • social media
          • online reputation management
          • smartphone applications
          • blog management
          • video content
        • events
          • public affairs
            • design
              • branding
              • newsletters
              • corporate literature
              • stationery
              • business cards
              • promotional items
          • our clients
            • Arts
              • Corporate and Business
                • Education
                  • Environmental
                    • Health and Care
                      • Manufacturing
                        • Not-for-profit Organisations
                          • Tourism and Hospitality
                          • our team
                          • case studies
                          • contact
                          • blog
                          • careers
                          • flickr

                          01/10/09

                          It pays to know your ‘netiquette’ says legal expert

                          AN employment law specialist is warning firms to get to grips with proper "netiquette" to avoid the minefield that is inappropriate e-mail communication in the workplace.

                          Cardiff Bay commercial law firm Capital Law says that despite advising an increasing number of clients on privacy issues and the amount of time employees spend sending personal e-mails, too few employers focus on what makes a good business e-mail and the dos and don'ts of e-mail etiquette.

                          Elin Pinnell of Capital Law

                          The issue hit the headlines recently when a tribunal found that a New Zealand office worker, sacked for writing e-mails in block capitals, was unfairly dismissed. The accountant had been forced out of her job at a healthcare company after colleagues complained that her e-mails were "shouty" and confrontational, but a panel found that while she had caused friction, her conduct did not amount to grounds for dismissal.

                          According to Capital Law partner and employment department head Elin Pinnell, the flaw in this case reflects the situation in thousands of firms across Wales.

                          She said: "If a company has no e-mail style guide employees cannot be certain about what kinds of communication are unacceptable.

                          "In the case of a dispute sparked by inappropriate e-mail usage, employers are only completely protected if they have a clear and transparent policy in place that spells out the ground rules."

                          When it comes to setting guidelines, Ms Pinnell - who advises major businesses across the UK on employment issues - recommends a simple rule of thumb; that employees should be prepared to sign on headed paper anything that they send out via company e-mail.

                          She also warned that over-familiar or misjudged e-mails to clients can cost firms tens of thousands of pounds in lost business, as well as cause irreparable reputation damage.

                          She said: "Almost two million e-mails are sent every second and the technology has truly transformed the way we interact in the workplace. But the risks to employers are clear.

                          "E-mail means having a permanent record of a conversation that may have been better conducted in person.

                          "Ultimately, it comes down to the judgement of the sender, which is why clear policies and proper training to educate staff about what is appropriate for e-mail communication is essential to avoid any problems."

                          Ms Pinnell pointed out that training staff in well-formulated and suitably worded e-mails can, in addition to helping avoid disputes and friction in the workplace, also bring business benefits.

                          She added: "Just as a poorly written e-mail can reflect badly on a company, a culture of well-written and effective online communication can really set a business apart from competitors.

                          "As a guideline, there are six simple rules that every business e-mail should be measured against; it must be properly laid out, written in plain English with no jargon and no text-speak or ‘smileys', have an accurate subject line, relate to a business issue, be less than a half screen in length, and be about a single topic.

                          "True workplace e-mail etiquette is about considering the impact on the person you are sending the e-mail to and only ever sending e-mail you would like to receive," she added.

                           

                          Bookmark and Share

                          Back to news list
                          Archives
                          2012 > January 2011 > December 2011 > November 2011 > October 2011 > September 2011 > August 2011 > July 2011 > June 2011 > May 2011 > April 2011 > March 2011 > February 2011 > January 2010 > December 2010 > November 2010 > October 2010 > September 2010 > August 2010 > June 2010 > May 2010 > April 2010 > March 2010 > February 2010 > January 2009 > December 2009 > November 2009 > October 2009 > September 2009 > August 2009 > July 2009 > May 2009 > April 2009 > March 2009 > February 2009 > January 2008 > November 2008 > October